Search for: "P. v. Heard" Results 521 - 540 of 2,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2013, 8:15 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: MICHAEL ANTONIO PATTERSON v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:15 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: CARLOS YAMMON PENA v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:07 pm
[update: the judgment confirming the award in Chester v. iFreedom is here; from Settle It Now] In case you have not heard, a California court has confirmed recently   a $4.1 billion award for an employment-related dispute. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 3-4 May 2017. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 3-4 May 2017. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:42 pm by William D. Kickham, Esq.
By now almost everyone in Massachusetts, and outside the state, has heard of the horrific story of how Kevin P. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:57 am
 After the hearing,  [h]aving heard the testimony and considered the parties' written arguments, the district court concluded that the testimony of Drs. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 3-4 May 2017. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 7:32 am by Brian Cordery
More from our authors: Concise European Copyright Law Second Edition by Thomas Dreier, P. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:39 pm by Eric S. Solotoff
I recently heard a person say that their spouse believed his alimony and child support would be based solely on his salary. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 3-4 May 2017. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 3-4 May 2017. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 11:54 am by Ashley Belanger
Enlarge (credit: NurPhoto / Contributor | NurPhoto) Today, US District Judge Amit Mehta heard opening statements in the Department of Justice's antitrust case challenging Google's search dominance. [read post]