Search for: "Patel v. Patel"
Results 521 - 540
of 785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
* Palmer v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:36 pm
Patel v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm
Taking much the same line as the European Patent Office regarding inventive step and the problem-solution approach, the judge reached the same decision -- regarding Glaxo's patent for Seretide (that's Advair in the US) as was reached in the United Kingdom.The decision last Thursday of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), England and Wales in Patel and Hussain v R [2009] EWCA Crim 2311, is a useful reminder that people who sell counterfeit VIAGRA, not to mention other… [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 10:53 am
" The court cited approvingly to the Fifth DCA's decision in Patel v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
ABDUL MUNEEM PATEL v NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD 17/2/2010 44. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm
See, e.g., Patel v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
Patel v Mirza, heard 16-18 February 2016. [read post]
16 May 2016, 1:00 am
Patel v Mirza, heard 16-18 February 2016. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am
This appeal will consider whether the Court of Appeal erred in its application of the Patel v Mirza guidelines. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am
Patel v Mirza, heard 16-18 February 2016. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am
Patel v Mirza, heard 16-18 February 2016. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
Patel v Mirza, heard 16-18 February 2016. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:00 am
Patel v Mirza, heard 16-18 February 2016. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
The appeal considered whether the Court of Appeal erred in its application of the Patel v Mirza guidelines. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 7 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:52 am
On Tuesday 16 February it will hear the appeal of Patel v Mirza whether the respondent is entitled to recover money transferred to the appellant in furtherance of a contract entered into for an illegal purpose from which the respondent only withdrew once it could no longer be performed. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Patel.] [read post]
