Search for: "Paul v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 9,086
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Hyemin Han
  Stewart Baker sat down with Alan Rozenshtein and Adam Candeub for a deep dive of the NetChoice v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Susan Landau
These have important long-term implications for the international defense strategies of the United States and other Western democracies. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 2:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, because Brooks plead guilty to certain tax evasion counts, those convictions were not abated by the Second Circuit in United States v Brooks (872 F3d 78, 87-88 [2d Cir 2017)). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The spectacle of, say, Justice John Paul Stevens (whom I much admired) serving for 34 years until he retired at the age of 90, is unknown not only abroad, but even more to the point, everywhere else in the United States (save, perhaps, Rhode Island). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
  The specification expressly states that “an effective dose … can be from … about 480 mg to about 720 mg per day. [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 10:02 am by Chip Merlin
—Yogi Bera _______________________________________1Estate of Minor v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm by Hyemin Han
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in NetChoice v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:04 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Wasserstein & JP Ellison —In a recent JAMA editorial (unfortunately behind a paywall), three authors called for increased use of the Park Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine, under which senior level officials at a company can be held liable under a strict liability theory even if they were not involved in, or even knew about, the alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 2:15 pm by Hadley Baker, Claudia Swain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s ruling on content moderation in NetChoice v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 7:10 am by Kirk M. Hartung
He specifically cited the 2014 Supreme Court decision in Alice v. [read post]