Search for: "People of the State of New York v. Smith" Results 521 - 540 of 872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm by Ken White
(People paying attention to the news for the last 12 years knew that already.) [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 7:14 am by Steven Gursten
However, in New York, where No Fault medical benefits are capped at $50,000, auto insurance costs $1,207. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am by VALL Blog Master
New York University, 2012. 272p bibl index afp; ISBN 9780814720189, $79.00; ISBN 9780814720196 pbk, $25.00. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals agrees this is a close case, stating that "one might read New York law as precluding a conviction for depraved indifference murder on the facts of this case. ... [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Southern District of New York 2012); U.S. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
In 1863, the New York Court of Appeals, inPeople v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 10:49 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  The Times reports that the top three homeowners’ insurers in New York are State Farm, Allstate and Travelers. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
As noted in the New York Law Journal, the Court of Appeals, by Judge Robert Smith, granted leave in People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:22 pm
Smith be sentenced in New York County prior to the imposition of sentence here. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  What I am pointing out, however, is that "new" technologies - like multi-touch - do not grow out of a vacuum. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
Most New York employment lawyers will tell you that, unlike in many other states, there is no cause of action for wrongful termination for whistleblowers under New york common law. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:55 pm by Dan Gauss
The tracking happened before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]