Search for: "People v High" Results 521 - 540 of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
The Strasbourg authorities including Dickson v United Kingdom [2008] 1 F.L.R. 1315 and Hirst v United Kingdom (2006) 42 E.H.R.R. 41 indicated that Article 8 was engaged whenever a public authority applied a policy which restricted benefits to a particular class of people such as prisoners, and it was important to remember this principle, set out in Hirst and cited in Dickson: Nor is there any place under the Convention system, where tolerance and broadmindedness are the… [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
  At which point the case takes several interesting turns that again tells us something about the people involved.It's a high-profile case about racism in the criminal defense system. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:31 pm
 And which proclaims on its web site that its principal "Values" are that "We work with great people. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:49 am by Matthew Weybrecht
One of the most famous and compelling defenses of the unitary executive comes from Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:41 pm by Record on Appeal
Today, the ICA issued an unpublished  memorandum opinion in State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:58 am
I like Merisant's lawyer's description of people misunderstanding Splenda as "magic sugar. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:06 pm
I also liked that he made no reference at all to the high-profile nature of either the case or the participants. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:04 am by Kendal Schoepfer
This is due to the bad stigma many people associate bankruptcy with, but this is why bankruptcy might make the most sense in the long run. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:04 am by Kendal Schoepfer
This is due to the bad stigma many people associate bankruptcy with, but this is why bankruptcy might make the most sense in the long run. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
The contributions to this on-line symposium on S.B. 1070 and Arizona v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm by Steve Bainbridge
It cites yours truly at several points, which is always an indicia of high quality work. ;-)) [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:44 pm
The interests of people in the Indian sub continent are involved and therefore parties cannot be allowed to decide the dispute based on English laws (the agreed law for settlement of dispute). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The only available guidance derives from DPP v Collins ([2006] UKHL 40), an appeal from the Divisional Court. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, based in Chicago, ruled on April 23 in Nuxoll v. [read post]