Search for: "People v Hurdle" Results 521 - 540 of 972
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am by Kalvis Golde
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Aaron Tang suggests that there is an issue lurking in Espinoza v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:32 am
As Amazon is not to be seen under items I to V, Amazon does not fall under vi. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Bailey
One such case was the 2018 case Stevens v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:27 am by SHG
Last year, in District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am by Florian Mueller
Despite most headlines describing them as a tax on “Big Tech”, it’s the little guys that end up paying. pic.twitter.com/jWQJ0VFsX4— Tim Bradshaw (@tim) September 1, 2020 At around the same time, other people commented on it as well, and one website had to backtrack because they might it sound like Apple passed 100% of those digital services taxes on to developers. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:25 pm by Stephen Wermiel
More on that later, as well as on some important preliminary hurdles in the cases. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 4:02 am by SHG
This sounds remarkably like the “actual malice” standard of Times v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
You’ve probably heard that in 1971 the Supreme Court reversed Muhammad Ali’s conviction for refusing to be inducted into the Selective Service. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:41 am by Daniel Shaviro
I accept the political science case for having a Constitution and court system, with the courts having a mandate, a la Marbury v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 5:43 am
Something like what we want – a rigorous, disciplined approach to warning adequacy – happened in Becker v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Parodies v. satires—cases are almost entirely wrong. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 12:07 pm by Florian Mueller
But if some people prefer to talk about background rather than substance, certain amicus curiae briefs should give them pause. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:07 am
The problem is suits for money damages against individuals must also overcome the hurdle of "qualified immunity," as described by Harlow v. [read post]