Search for: "People v Legall"
Results 521 - 540
of 31,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2024, 2:16 pm
Conclusion: As the legal battle unfolds, the Neville et al. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 3:05 am
Wade: Voices that Shaped the Abortion Debate Before The Supreme Court's Ruling, a sourcebook that explains the political and legal arguments people made for and against abortion rights leading up to the Supreme Court's 1973 decision.Before Roe vs. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:39 pm
Reading about the rise of the administrative state in a textbook may be enough for some people, but for others, visualizing it through an Ngram may be more helpful. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:50 am
Marshall won 29 out of 32 cases he argued in front of the high court, including Brown v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:13 am
The Santonocitos brought the petition pro-se, but a legal services company (We the People) prepared and filed the petition on their behalf, charging them a $229 fee. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:23 pm
This proposal builds upon the Supreme Court’s recent holding in Turner v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:30 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:41 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 4:19 am
“Plaintiffs demonstrated a reasonable excuse for their default (CPLR 5015 [a] [1]), based on law office failure, as detailed in the affirmation of their former counsel who miscalendared the motion (CPLR 2005; People’s United Bank v Latini Tuxedo Mgt., LLC, 95 AD3d 1285, 1286 [2d Dept 2012]). [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
In Erie Insurance v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:16 am
On January 21, 2010, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling in People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
The LII / Legal Information Institute (Cornell) liibulletin piece summarizes beautifully: Dillon v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 5:42 am
Knoll for people charged with a DWI. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:54 am
(Katebi v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
Thomas, the court in the case of People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
We generally -- and purposefully -- give legal changes retrospective (rather than merely prospective) effect in order to incentivize litigants to challenge existing precedent. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:12 am
" initial people in the opinion. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:53 pm
Facts of Mitchell v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 9:28 am
. - I tend to think that I'm reasonably well-informed as to various legal -- and non-legal -- terms. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:51 am
Or, alternately, address the merits and decide one way or the other whether those tree-shaped things are legal or not. [read post]
