Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
In 2006, that ferry sank and more than 1,000 people died. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm
” As Warby J said in Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) – “This is a beguilingly simple sentence. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 8:13 am
We have already held that the area under the central dome of the disputed construction believed and worshipped by the Hindu people as the place of birth of Lord Rama and they were worshiping thereat since time immemorial. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am
Although the judgement, given by Baroness Hale, did not mention human rights, it clearly impacts on article 8 rights to family life, and alongside the recent decision in Pinnock, could greatly increase the number of people to which local authorities are obliged to provide housing. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Williams-Sonoma) People ex rel. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 3:27 am
Lord Briggs and Lord Sales give a joint judgment with which the other members of the Court agree. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
If the details of such allegations are made public, they are capable of causing a great deal of harm to the individual concerned, since many people are inclined to assume that there is “no smoke without fire”. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:33 am
Henchmen, under orders of Lord Halifax, stormed into Mr. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
In both interviews, Dr O’Doherty was asked about the platforming of ‘people connected with paramilitaries on air’ and across local media. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 1:48 am
ZS v DP on issue of mens rea in unlawful carnal knowledge. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm
Like many people, I have been thinking back to where I was on that day. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:08 pm
Lord Denning MR articulated this idea expressly in Initial Services Ltd v Putterill [1967] 3 All ER 145, 148 when explaining that: No private obligations can dispense with that universal one which lies on every member of the society to discover every design which may be formed, contrary to the laws of the society, to destroy the public welfare. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
The landlord can give a counter-notice disputing the RTM company’s entitlement: s.84 (various other people also can, but in reality it is landlords who do this). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
The landlord can give a counter-notice disputing the RTM company’s entitlement: s.84 (various other people also can, but in reality it is landlords who do this). [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am
Gustovarac v Croatia App. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am
Gustovarac v Croatia App. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:42 pm
In the late 19th century, Lord Shand observed at page 1113 of Godfrey v W & D C Thomson (1890) 17 R 1108: “… I think that in these times persons must be allowed to speak pretty freely of public political conduct and principles …” Mr Crow aruged that the leaflets were capable of meaning that he was one of those involved in the scandals, waste and other matters referred to. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:20 am
He commented on the court’s commitment to quality, and the fact that a number of cases heard by the UKSC over the past year have been of considerable public interest (referring in particular to R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another, Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 – Reference by the Attorney General and Bank Mellat v HM Treasury). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am
The leading case on the issue is the House of Lords judgment in the 2004 case of R v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm
However, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2006] UKHL 44 he was described by Lord Hoffmann as being “hostile to the spirit of Reynolds” and his finding in favour of the Saudi Arabian businessman was reversed, the House of Lords finding that qualified privilege did apply. [read post]
