Search for: "People v. Andrew" Results 521 - 540 of 1,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
Andrew Harris of Bloomberg reports that a federal judge in Utah will not consider a bid to block enforcement of that state’s immigration laws until after the Court’s decision in Arizona v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:22 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Navratilova even participated as one of the plaintiffs in the ACLU/Lambda Legal lawsuit challenging a 1992 anti-gay Colorado ballot initiative that ultimately resulted in the landmark Romer v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm by Hudson Hongo
“Encryption is the best tool we have for safeguarding our privacy and security online — and privacy and security are especially important for young people,” said EFF Surveillance Litigation Director Andrew Crocker. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
I also re-connected with people I've met before, such as Kurt Opsahl (Deep Links; winner of a CLAY award for his work on the Apple v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 am by Jeff Gamso
  And, of course, even that rule doesn't apply when the "public safety exception" of New York v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020).The law and politics of LGBTQ rights and religious freedom have changed significantly since Andrew Koppelman’s book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am by CodeX
Another example is Google’s $5 billion lawsuit for tracking users’ incognito sessions in Brown v Google LLC. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Here Brandsmiths' Andrew Lee pens a guest post on the dissemination of misinformation, or at least over-generalised information, to a wide audience of people who may not realise its true import. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by INFORRM
US Law and Media News It is reported that a study in the United States has found that young people care about privacy just as much as older people but behave more recklessly online because they think the law gives them more protection than it actually does. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Neil H. Buchanan
 And of course, not a single Republican screamed from the rooftops that we must "get to the bottom" of the IRS's audits of James Comey and Andrew McCabe during Donald Trump's time in office. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
For example, in Green Corns Ltd v Claverley Group Ltd [2005] EWHC 958 (QB) (18 May 2005) [h/t Andrew Scott] Tugendhat J granted an injunction restraining a local newspaper from publishing the addresses of homes provided for troubled children. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
” The latest Edelman Trust survey has revealed that two-thirds (67%) of people globally have said that they believe journalists purposely try to mislead people by saying things that are false or grossly exaggerated. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Marshall Project, Andrew Cohen remarks that the cert petition in Williams v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Nor does this COVID-19 vaccine requirement discriminate on the basis of any of the four grounds recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada to date as being analogous, which include i) citizenship (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia, 1989 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1989] 1 SCR 143); ii) marital status (Miron v Trudel, 1995 CanLII 97 (SCC), [1995] 2 SCR 418; Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v Walsh, 2002 SCC 83); iii) sexual orientation (Egan v Canada, 1995… [read post]