Search for: "People v. Burns"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,565
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2012, 7:03 am
The US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi) on April 2, 2012, announced its decision in ACS Recovery Services, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Black (2003) In this case, three men contested a Virginia law that made burning a cross a crime on its own, without unmistakable evidence that the act was made to intimidate people. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:20 pm
A defamation case against the Court of Appeals of Tennessee for defamatory comments made by a district attorney general came to a head in Floyd Rodney Burns v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:53 pm
Kogan v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 4:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:35 am
Snyder v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
And when the court addressed the 1846 retrocession in Phillips v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 8:52 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm
If elected officials wish to burn witches, surely they will be able to provide empirical evidence at least as good as the evidence for creation “science” or the evidence Justice Kennedy in Carhart v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:56 am
To burn it as medical waste. [read post]
6 May 2019, 10:28 am
(discussing misperception that CDA 230 causes platforms to tolerate such speech). [77] Snyder v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
In LePage v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
The laws that apply to generic drugs recently shifted in favor of the manufacturers at the expense of injured consumers in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Pilva, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
It has been my experience that the crime of “drug paraphernalia” catches most people off guard. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:41 pm
Gee Hesa Shithead or, to bring this back to go, People of New York v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE People v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:14 am
The state also contended that the Supreme Court had said explicitly in a 1966 decision (Burns v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 3:46 am
But chances of that happening are slim to none, and the Marshal clearly couldn’t make them, and comity between justices makes one burning another unthinkable. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 2:02 am
Law students will recall Arizona's Broadbent v. [read post]
