Search for: "People v. District Court of State" Results 521 - 540 of 14,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 7:40 am by Josh Blackman
At the bottom of page 10, the Supreme Court cited Kleindienst v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
The court recounts the history of the first executive order and explains that its purported purpose was to “protect the American people from terrorist attacks by foreign nationals admitted to the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 8:13 am
"The Supreme Court has turned down countless Second Amendment appeals since it established an individual right to keep guns in the home for self-defense in 2008 in District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:35 pm
Tomack, was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This one failed at the district court, but the Court of Appeals says the inmate makes a good point about the admissibility of his confession.The case is Dearstyne v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 8:29 am by John Jascob
The district court, sua sponte, requested briefing on whether the complaint was subject to dismissal under Morrison v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Further, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has entered a protective order governing the production of confidential information. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Petitioners filed for certiorari on the grounds that the district court decision relied on the Second Circuit’s ruling in Kiobel v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:39 am by Lyle Denniston
  If that change shuts out the legislature, more  or less entirely, that could be a constitutional problem, or so it appeared during the argument in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:16 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
In a 2-1 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that a certificate mailed to a state driver, notifying him of his suspended license, is "testimonial" as that term is used in the constitution thus, the Secretary of State must produce it's clerk at a trial for driving on a suspended license.The case, People v Nunley, arose in a district court in Washtenaw County. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:23 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In a 2-1 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that a certificate mailed to a state driver, notifying him of his suspended license, is "testimonial" as that term is used in the constitution thus, the Secretary of State must produce it's clerk at a trial for driving on a suspended license.The case, People v Nunley, arose in a district court in Washtenaw County. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The landscape changed dramatically, however, in 2013, with the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]