Search for: "People v. Doctor"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2011, 6:50 am
Into that fray went Lombardi v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
S.L. was well settled in Kansas simply because he had a doctor, dentist, a preschool, and people looking after him in Kansas. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
S.L. was well settled in Kansas simply because he had a doctor, dentist, a preschool, and people looking after him in Kansas. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
In Mock v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 8:10 am
Cal.). in Loggins v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:31 pm
In the wake of both Whole Woman’s Health and June Medical Services v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Today’s case is Tarasoff v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
Doe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:27 pm
This law was made clear in the case Rhoades v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:48 am
The Supreme Court of California ruled that balance billing is not allowed in the state in Prospect Health Source Medical Group, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:13 pm
It was a close race in Christopher v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 4:37 pm
Most often prosecutors will employ the services of a licensed doctor to opine as to the age of the child. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 3:46 pm
Ameritech Services, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:03 pm
Alaska v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 10:30 am
But not before the doctor writes in the patient's chart: "While an [sic] MRI apparently the EKG electrode was not removed and the patient sustained a second degree burn to the left lower quadrant. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:09 am
(website omitted due to Blogger limitations; see article) (last visited Aug. 11. 2009) Private studies have flatly rejected a correlation between states that have enacted damage caps and premium rates for doctors. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:37 am
The fund denied the doctor's request on the basis that the doctor had not demonstrated the medical necessity of the extra treatments.A workers' compensation law judge upheld the fund's decision, as did the Workers' Compensation Board. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
For instance: Janus holds that the First Amendment generally bars compelling people to turn over money to a private organization that will use it for speech.[9] But Rumsfeld v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
For instance: Janus holds that the First Amendment generally bars compelling people to turn over money to a private organization that will use it for speech.[9] But Rumsfeld v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
American Library Assn. and Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
