Search for: "People v. Germany" Results 521 - 540 of 1,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
    The filing also coincides with the ruling of Judge Andreas Voss of the Mannheim Regional Court in Germany granting a permanent injunction against Apple in Germany in respect of the push e-mail service of Apple’s iCloud and any devise that can access it. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 12:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Lunney: are these recent v. historical? [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:18 am by Ben
Noting the 'chilling effect' of the latter, the WGAW warn that the current legislation stifles innovation as people may be hesitant to start innovating businesses, fearing that copyright holders may come after them. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:05 am by Matiangai Sirleaf
” Yet, the report only recommends that the Israeli government comply “fully and immediately” with the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) orders in the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:58 pm by Florian Mueller
(The Supreme Court won't necessarily follow it anyway, but it wouldn't have asked if it didn't care.)One can only speculate about the first question and make a more or less educated guess about the second point.Everybody who is interested in software IP issues knows that non-technical people face particular difficulties in figuring them out. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 4:03 pm
There was a criminal action in Germany under Germany's antiterrorism law - the guys ultimately apologized. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 12:11 am by Florian Mueller
There are many apps out there that have more than 100,000 users in a country like Germany (more than 80 million inhabitants), France, or Italy (the latter two each have more than 60 million people).If you have more than 100K people using your app in a given year (as the sum of first-time users who just downloaded and recurring users from previous years), the bill would (if passed) apply to you even if your revenues were minimal! [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:15 am by davidmginsberg
In the three months since I started this Blog, it has been viewed by 3,446 people, including 404 from China, 57 from Germany, 40 from Italy, and hundreds of people from dozens of other countries. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 8:56 am
Hundreds of people were bused in from all over the country by DC-Cam and other organizations. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm by Liz Campbell
The absence of judicial oversight does not contravene Art 8, as is evident from Uzun v Germany. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications -- epilepsy,… [read post]