Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 521 - 540
of 17,530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2009, 2:08 pm
In People v Shapard (2009 NY Slip Op 00903 [4th Dept 2/6/09]) the Court held that a defendant may not waive his right to a presentence report prior to the imposition of a sentence of imprisonment.We agree with defendant that his waiver of the presentence report should not have been given effect pursuant to CPL 390.20 (4) (a). [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:31 am
“There has been some discussion on the UK Human Rights Blog about the judgments in the Hirst v UK/Scoppula v Italy cases, the latest of which was given this week. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:21 am
At the heart of McDaniel v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Their children are likely to be attending schools in the area and it does not seem perverse that those people should be given priority above those who are not. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Their children are likely to be attending schools in the area and it does not seem perverse that those people should be given priority above those who are not. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:18 am
By Eric Goldman Boring v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:04 pm
Beijing Science & Technology University (1999) (re-issued as guiding case #38) and Yang Baoxi v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:16 am
Even without death being on the table, most people convicted in Arizona of a double homicide are given a minimum of a natural life sentence. , whereas Mr. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 1:11 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:42 am
And there were more explicit threats of unlawfulness, given... [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
But the “fear that people would make bad decisions if given truthful information” cannot justify content-based burdens on speech. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:24 pm
Well yes, but this should be happening anyway (see K v K wherein the Court of Appeal said ‘Woah, woah, woah – that’s not quite what we meant in H-N. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
People v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
In People v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:09 am
Inadequate regulation was at the heart of Bertanowski v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
v=Tr0Vt7E7U7w [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
It looks like USA v. [read post]
