Search for: "People v. Hering (1999)" Results 521 - 540 of 1,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
They may also read the classic ethics case, Spaulding v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm by Amul Kalia
Related Issues: PrivacyCALEAEncrypting the WebLaw Enforcement AccessSecurityRelated Cases: Bernstein v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Here, it refers to its 1999 opinion in People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 am by Tessa Shepperson
Here you need to be careful that the clause is fair and complies with the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (discussed in more detail on days 15 and 16). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Cir. 1999), but courts tend to apply the prior restraint doctrine to commercial speech. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
Roger Wyand QC, sitting as Deputy Judge, addresses these issues and more in his recent judgment in Comic Enterprises v 20th Century Fox [2014] EWHC 185 [not yet on BAILII, but you can check it out here or download it here].Comic Enterprises operates live entertainment venues in Birmingham, Cardiff, Oxford and Nottingham. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
Supp. 2d 231, 242 n. 7 (E.D.N.Y.1999) (suggesting, but not holding, a schoolteacher’s photography of female teenagers was not protected by the First Amendment); see also Porat v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999)).U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 6:22 am by Eugene Volokh
" And Judge Traber conditionally granted the request for pseudonymity; here's an excerpt from her Tentative Ruling last month (in the case that is now called Doe 1 v. [read post]