Search for: "People v. Lane"
Results 521 - 540
of 942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 7:57 am
If it were permissible for people to drive on the line dividing lanes going the same direction, on the line demarcating bicycle lanes, or on the centerline dividing a lane from oncoming traffic, the risk of accidents will increase. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:32 am
The unemployment system is designed to provide benefits to people without jobs. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Circuit’s opinion in Verizon v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 10:45 am
Byers and 2009’s Solomon v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
With respect to grand jury proceedings, the district attorney has a “duty of fair dealing to the accused” (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105 [1984]; see also, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 26 [1986]) and to the court (People v Ianniello, 21 NY2d 418, 424 [1968]). [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:49 am
Tabitha Wiggins v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:57 pm
The ruling in Pattullo-Banks v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:46 am
Next Thursday's Kat Chat between Christopher Rennie-Smith and Darren Smyth about life in the fast lane at the European Patent Office, detailed here, is now pretty well full to capacity. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:37 am
In People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 10:53 am
Case citation: Demetriades v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:16 am
v=w6O_ZjxRGhM Mark Wandall was in his brother-in-law’s car after having dinner together. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
In 2010, 14,772 people were murdered. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 2:35 pm
This question was recently answered by the Court of Appeal in Olive Lane Industrial Park v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
At JURIST, Jaclyn Belczyk reports on Thursday’s decision in Lane v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:30 pm
Does Lane v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
In any event, today’s Supreme Court decision in Lane v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:22 pm
According to People v Ellis, 169 AD2d 838, 839 [1991] it was held that where the defendant was driving in an erratic manner, it constituted a sufficient reason to justify an initial stop by an officer. [read post]
21 May 2014, 7:13 am
Which I think is legal, based on Gilmer v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 3:30 am
Which I think is legal, based on Gilmer v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:55 pm
Net neutrality means no paid fast lanes and slow lanes. [read post]
