Search for: "People v. Novo"
Results 521 - 540
of 544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2008, 1:52 am
Superior Court (People), case no. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:17 am
David Martinez, defendant-appellant
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeDivision's 'Flawed' Sixth Parole Hearing Grants 'Model' Inmate Seventh Hearing De Novo Matter of South v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:14 am
Craig & Bishop, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 4:04 pm
US v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
.-- With the McIntosh v. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 1:10 am
New York City Transit Authority Subscription Required
QUEENS COUNTYCriminal Practice
Court Finds JHO's Rulings Fair, Impartial; Defendant Denied De Novo Hearing
People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:37 am
” Pisciotta v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 11:41 am
Darden v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
See also Flood v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 10:39 am
Par Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:32 am
The newest decision out of Massachusetts on this topic, McGillivray v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 1:20 am
Subscription Required
NASSAU COUNTYAlternative Dispute Resolution
Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Address Plaintiff's Action for De Novo Review of Arbitration Award
Tray v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 1:00 am
"When reviewing a motion to reconsider that was based only on the trial court's application (or purported misapplication) of existing law, as opposed to a motion to reconsider that is based on new facts or legal theories not presented in the prior proceedings, our standard of review is de novo … 'Where a party's motion for reconsideration merely asks the trial court to reexamine its earlier application of existing law,'… [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:38 am
Marshall v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 3:46 pm
Oscar Private Equity Investments v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 6:14 am
People v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:24 am
NASSAU COUNTYCivil PracticeDefendant's Demand for Trial de Novo After Service Of Judgment by Plaintiff Is Deemed Timely Bajaj v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:35 am
Cecil Morgan KINGS COUNTYLegal Profession Civil Court Cannot Grant Equitable Relief; Attorney Must Commence De Novo Action in Supreme Court Pruzan v. [read post]
