Search for: "People v. Russel"
Results 521 - 540
of 940
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2013, 9:30 am
“I remember I got to discuss constitutional law with Russell Pearce,” he said. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:57 pm
In his rather transparent effort to shift into a populist campaign mode, President Barack Obama today devoted his Saturday radio address to slamming the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:38 am
Thanks to Greg Lastowka for pointing me to this case: Bach v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
“, and encouraged people to make donations to support local teen Bayley Simpson, who will compete in the UCI Juniors Track Cycling World Championships in Seoul later this summer — Russell is Bayley’s (very proud) former hockey coach. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am
Ohio v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
This morning, people in coffee houses and churches across the land will no doubt be talking about the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
Argument preview: What can a federal habeas petitioner argue when defending a judgment in his favor?
14 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
Shoot, you twelve people know what the evidence is. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument Wednesday in Pereida v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:36 pm
Having police ask people their immigration status based upon “reasonable suspicion” is the basis of Senator Russell Pearce’s brainchild. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 7:19 pm
This morning brought the first opinion from Justice Neil Gorsuch, explaining the decision of a unanimous court in Henson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:03 am
” On Wednesday, the Supreme Court examined this clause during oral argument in County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:08 am
In Tuesday’s argument in Heffernan v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:02 am
In Maples v. [read post]
Argument preview: Justices to consider constitutionality of cross-shaped war memorial on public land
21 Feb 2019, 10:37 am
In 1971, in a case called Lemon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
[Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among counsel to the petitioners in NACS.] [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
Women and AI: Harms, Impacts and Remedies, Information Law and Policy Centre, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR, 7 March 2019, 17.00 to 19.00. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:43 am
This event commemorated the 1967 Supreme Court case of Loving v. [read post]
