Search for: "People v. Southern" Results 521 - 540 of 2,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2019, 9:33 am by Karen Gullo
“After six years of litigation, EFF and ACLU SoCal are finally getting access to millions of ALPR scans that will shed light on how the technology is being used, where it’s being used, and how it affects people’s privacy,” said EFF Surveillance Litigation Director Jennifer Lynch. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 10:30 am by Unknown
It links Mediterranean and Migration Studies by articulating three sub-regions (Southern Europe, Northern Africa and Middle East) or the so-called Southern and Eastern Mediterranean (SEM) countries in the EU parlance. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:40 pm by ACLU
Louis region of Southern Illinois, where we have served patients from across the country, especially the Midwest and South, for nearly 50 years. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 9:45 am
It would be advisable to familiarize yourself with the recent decision, in the Southern District of New York, in Aguilar v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:01 pm by Matthew Nelson
In People v Washington, the Michigan Supreme Court denied defendant’s application for leave to appeal. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:01 pm
  Henry's nonetheless in the small group of people who took part in the taking of another human life. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Southern District of New York 2012); U.S. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm by admin
Richard Booker, Bob Marley Movement of Jah People, Inc. and The Bob Marley Heritage Corporation, Case No. 1:11-cv-24326-MGC which is currently pending in the United States District Court in and for the Southern District of Florida in Miami. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Korala Assoc    Southern District of Ohio at DaytonALICE M. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:36 pm by Alfred Brophy
Third, Southern white slave-owners males were worse than Southern white women slave-owners mostly (e.g., 8-10, Martin v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:25 pm
The People's Court of Chaoyang District ruled in favor of the plaintiff and against China Southern, holding that the airline should refund the 1,300 yuan the passenger spent on his ticket for having failed to inform him that he might not be allowed to fly as planned. [read post]