Search for: "People v. Wells"
Results 521 - 540
of 26,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 4:53 am
The Soriano case, which refers to “Farmers Insurance Company v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
Elektra v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
She's got a very specific name as well. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
This is not going to end well. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 8:22 am
" Okay, well, you definitely shouldn't do that. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 12:22 pm
Most people know what Title Nine entails. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 10:39 am
Last month, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Haaland v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am
However, as UK law stands there is no current legal duty on editors to inform people such as Mr Mosley prior to publication. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:15 pm
" You can read the entire decision by clicking here: Rea v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:03 pm
So maybe it's 48 -- or 53 -- additional post-death years as well. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:21 pm
For reasons that are not at all surprising given both the nature of this institution as well as the facts underlying the sentence.This is not to assert, by the way, that the California Supreme Court in the post-Bird era is totally incapable of exercising detached legal judgment in death penalty cases. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:39 pm
And, among other things, recall seeing the Canoga Park Wienerschnitzel -- a chain, among others, of which this East Coast boy had never heard a peep.Based upon this (admittedly long-ago) experience, I can say fairly confidently that it surprised me not in the least that there were multiple gang-related murders at this establishment.Check out the opinion for a fairly good discussion (by both the majority and the dissent) of the nature of gangs in the modern era as well as the legal… [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:12 am
The former may well not be able to appeal his conviction, but the latter can. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 4:32 pm
Others will say: "Well, I could, but it would be difficult. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:48 pm
Which was going to make me go ballistic.Basically, a guy who was in a gang stole a car, and a police officer testified at trial: "Well, if you steal a car, you're able to use that car to commit crimes on behalf of a gang if you feel like it, so yeah, I'd stay that stealing the car was in furtherance of gang activity. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:28 pm
Ones that might well not be worth the transaction cost to litigate. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:31 pm
And, as grim as that description may well be, is probably less grim than his next 100 years. [read post]
24 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Then see if you agree with me as regards the following maxim:When you're clearly guilty of murder, put on no evidence at the guilt phase, and have prior convictions for both the forcible rape of a 9-year old girl as well as a home invasion robbery, don't repeatedly make (and get caught with) shanks and jail-made handcuff keys in your cell while you're awaiting trial. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 11:06 am
When it's 10 years, I tend to say: "Well, I'm not positive from what I read that you're guilty, but you could easily be, so I guess I'm on board. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 12:21 pm
Since you may well need the cash. [read post]
