Search for: "Peoples et al v. Property " Results 521 - 540 of 812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2012, 3:36 am by Dave
Cook v The Mortgage Business PLC et al [2012] EWCA Civ 17[note for law students: this is a really important case on land registration in which the principles in Abbey National BS v Cann are considered and applied. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am by Chris Castle
  I have to assume that they each actually read the draft text before putting their name to a criticism, even when in the company of luminaries like Lessig et al. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:35 am by David Hart QC
Leeds City Council et al [2011] EWCA Civ 1447 Retrospective legislation often gives rise to claims under Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention - you  may have some legal advantage (whether it be property or a legal claim) which you then find yourselves losing as a result of the change of law. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
Thus, for instance, Liqun Cao et al, Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am J Crim Just 85, 96 (2002), reports that 35 percent of a representative sample of Cincinnati residents age 21 and above said they would not be willing to shoot a gun at an armed and threatening burglar who had broken into their home. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Mandelman
 If many of our current laws governing the transfer of property don’t matter and aren’t going to be enforced then let’s get rid of them. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm by Biersdorf & Associates
  Resonating inside my head are cases such as Kelo vs. the City of New London, Goldstein et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
Google: Judge Appoints a Damages Expert  In the Oracle v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
In 2001, the case of Golan et al v Holder was brought by a collection of plaintiffs, including orchestra conductors, educators, performers, motion picture distributors and publishers against the United States government alleging that Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA)- section 104A and 109 of the Copyright Act - is unconstitutional. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Neeley v NameMedia Inc, et al (5:09-cv-05151)(11-2558) Is a fully briefed Eighth Circuit appeal that will be ignored by the United States Courts because of being pro se and IFP. [read post]