Search for: "Perez v. United States"
Results 521 - 540
of 717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2022, 8:03 am
§551(5); see Perez v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:49 am
Work may be considered as ongoing during a short lapse of time necessary to conduct tests designed to assure proper performance where such testing is an essential element of the work by the insured (see Perez v New York City Hous. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:30 am
• United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
” United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:58 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
PEREZ, AND REV. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:04 am
The Court of Appeals decision relied substantially on section 602(a) of the Copyright Code which deals with infringing importation of copies and the case of BMG Music v Perez (1991) where BMG Music was able to prohibit a reseller's business. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming, noting that at “issue is not just Lee’s fate, but also the Court’s view of the state of plea bargaining in this country. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am
In Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 1:41 pm
Wise presents an unusually interesting issue: "Whether Appellant's confinement conditions, including and in particular with respect to his claim of having been confined with Enemy Prisoners of War in Iraq, were unlawful, and whether, in the context presented, Appellant forfeited his claims of unlawful post-trial confinement by failing to exhaust his administrative remedies under United States v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:40 am
This year, however, the Court has released 21, including blockbusters United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
• United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
Maynard); (3) harm to others is a limit on free exercise (Reynolds; United States v. [read post]