Search for: "Petition for Review"
Results 521 - 540
of 32,729
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
As this Cooley PubCo blog points out, the NRDC and the Sierra Club have now filed unopposed motions seeking voluntary dismissal of their petitions for review, both saying they’re planning to focus their limited resources to advocate for further disclosure outside of the litigation. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
More problematically still, the analysis of the Colazzo court drew heavily on standards of review and other doctrinal formulations plucked explicitly from U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:02 am
The blog's Cases section includes helpful overviews of the issues under review, with links to relevant case documents. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Salix has petitioned for rehearing en banc, arguing that the panel majority improperly found facts in the first instance rather than reviewing and analyzing the district court’s fact-finding as required by precedent. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:45 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review, alleging that the new requirements were “unnecessary and overly burdensome. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:32 pm
The district court granted EPA’s motion to dismiss, finding that EPA granted the petition The post Appellate Court Affirms Decision That TSCA Section 21 Petition Seeking PFAS Testing Is Not Subject to Review appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:32 pm
The district court granted EPA’s motion to dismiss, finding that EPA granted the petition The post Appellate Court Affirms Decision That TSCA Section 21 Petition Seeking PFAS Testing Is Not Subject to Review appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:20 pm
Paley, Washington asks the justices to grant review and reverse the 5th Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 10:29 am
Regular Reviews: Periodically review ownership documents to ensure they align with current intentions and legal standards. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
The Medical Board accused Siew of gross negligence related to the care of six patients, repeated negligent acts, excessive prescribing, failing to to maintain adequate and accurate medical records, and failing to review patients’ controlled substance history using a state database before writing them prescriptions, according to a petition filed in January. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 2:00 am
Vichy’s petition alleged the County violated CEQA by erroneously determining it had no regulatory responsibility for the Project, thereby allowing it to go forward without review, and that the City had committed multiple CEQA violations with regards to the permitting of the Project, most notably Vichy alleged the City improperly determined the project was not subject to CEQA. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
[The Spring/Summer '24 issue of the California Supreme Court Historical Society Review is now available. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:53 pm
” The Cert Petition On March 4, 2024, Facebook filed a petition to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:12 pm
In their Supreme Court petition, Bufkin and Thornton argue this interpretation renders § 7261(b) superfluous and frustrates Congress’s intent for the CAVC to ensure veterans received the benefit of the doubt. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:05 pm
The intermediate level will hear nearly all appeals; you don’t need permission to seek review of a trial court decision from these courts. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am
Background Ingenico Inc. filed petitions seeking inter partes review of U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
., a case that asked the Court to review a U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
., a case that asked the Court to review a U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
The Supreme Court granted the Regents’ petition for review on these issues, and denied plaintiffs and appellants’ (“Good Neighbor’) petition challenging the Court of Appeal’s conclusions that enrollment-driven population increases were not part of the 2021 LRDP project and that the 2021 EIR therefore did not need to analyze an enrollment-limiting alternative. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:07 am
The justices granted review in Facebook v. [read post]