Search for: "Pettis v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2009, 3:58 am
The constitutionality of Ohio’s Adam Walsh Act, the latest effort to impose ever more Draconian sanctions on sex offenders, is presently pending before the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
As we prepare to commemorate the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 4:00 am
(Contract law is generally state law. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm
Just as "no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion," it is not, as the Court has repeatedly held, the role of the State or its officials to prescribe what shall be offensive. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:33 pm
Petty, 664 S.W.2d 77 (Tenn. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 8:30 pm
The 2016 Colorado Computer Crime Case Of People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:24 pm
In the landmark case of Brown v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 1:59 pm
In the landmark case of Brown v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:30 pm
The settlement resolves a FLSA lawsuit brought by the Labor Department Wage & Hour Division against four related contractors in Perez v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:16 pm
A Nassau County Drug Possession Lawyer said in the landmark case of Brown v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:22 pm
As the United States Supreme Court said over 100 years ago in Coffin v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm
It shows a petty, dim-witted, malicious, hedonistic racist that was power-hungry and resilient enough to reach the highest echelons of state power, and seduce the political eyes of the brightest minds of the national Republican Party. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:54 am
The Ninth Circuit’s opinion in PhRMA v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
Young v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 4:51 am
As the Hulk v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 5:32 am
” People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 8:39 am
[State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:09 am
Let’s let the 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
