Search for: "Pfizer Inc."
Results 521 - 540
of 1,516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Trent Horne and Edward (Ted) Yoo In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of Canada has provided valuable guidance to patent agents and litigators as to how Canadian patents will be read and enforced (Teva Canada Limited v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2012 SCC 60). [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Trent Horne and Edward (Ted) Yoo In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of Canada has provided valuable guidance to patent agents and litigators as to how Canadian patents will be read and enforced (Teva Canada Limited v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2012 SCC 60). [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 10:40 am
Indian drugmaker Ranbaxy Laboratories said it issued the recall because of its generic version of Pfizer Inc.'s Lipitor because after it learned that some lots of its 10-, 20- and 40-milligram doses of the drug may contain glass. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., 839 F. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Pfizer Inc., 58 A.D.3d 138, 141 (N.Y. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
Wyeth, Inc., 37 A.3d 549, 576 (N.J. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:52 pm
Pfizer, Inc., No. 2:09-cv-262, 2012 WL 2970627 (D. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:01 am
Pfizer, Inc., 861 F. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 6:13 pm
The parties are required to maintain the viability, marketability, and competitiveness of the divestiture products.To remedy the FTC's concerns with respect to the three remaining product markets, the combined entity would be required to amend an existing development and manufacturing agreement between Actavis and Pfizer, Inc. and transfer the manufacturing rights back to Pfizer. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:13 pm
Lamm’s personal views and should not be attributed to Pfizer Inc. or to Gunster. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 7:57 am
" Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:37 pm
Lower middle class residents sought to prevent the City of New London Connecticut from taking their property via eminent domain as the owners argued the property was not being taken for "public use" as required by the 5th Amendment.Our antagonist in this story, Pfizer, Inc. wanted to build a large scale commercial development, and seizing the property of private homeowners was necessary to achieve Pfizer's goal. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:34 am
Pfizer Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Pfizer Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:13 am
Corp., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the global pharmaceutical company, Pfizer Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:28 pm
This time, the drug at issue was Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:49 pm
Manufactured by Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:46 pm
Manufactured by Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:41 pm
Manufactured by Pfizer, Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:47 pm
” The court here was persuaded by the reasoning in Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
