Search for: "Phillips v. No Defendants Named"
Results 521 - 540
of 542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:11 am
’” Id., at *5 (quoting Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:53 am
Case Name: Dunsmore v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:53 am
Case Name: Dunsmore v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 12:44 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property
Laches, Estoppel Inapplicable in Parties' Dispute Over Registration, Use of 'Artemis Records' Name
Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 7:44 pm
Phillips, Determining if A Trade Dress is Valid, 29 IDAHO L. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 9:57 am
" Phillips v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:32 am
Bawag v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
Cole of Manatt Phelps Phillips sent word of a Manatt client's recent victory in CKE Restaurant v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:33 am
Case Name: Ecosystem Resources, LC v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:31 am
Per Shappell v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:04 am
Gordon and Tracy V. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 5:40 am
Phillips v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
See, e.g., Phillips v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:25 am
The court said that plaintiff needed to amend his complaint to link the named defendants with the alleged conduct.In Larry v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:51 pm
It would be my thought that, to comply with Phillip Morris, a trial court must now instruct the jury, immediately after this instruction, as follows: While you may consider evidence of the defendant's conduct toward persons other than [name of plaintiff] for the purpose of considering the reprehensibility of [name of defendant]'s conduct, you may not include in an award of punitive damages any amount for the purpose of punishing… [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:43 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Phillips v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:35 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Eugenia Crowe-Phillips v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
In the tradition of mummering, every blogger visited in Blawg Review #89 will be permitted to ask no more than three questions in a single private email to the editor as to his identity -- each question requiring a simple "yes or no" answer -- but may not ask a direct question as to a name or other pseudonym used by the editor, such as, "Are you so-and-so? [read post]
