Search for: "Plaintiff v. Defendant"
Results 521 - 540
of 75,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 2:26 pm
CNN, Inc.: Plaintiffs Jack and Leslie Flynn have sued Defendant Cable News Network … under Rhode Island's false-light statute. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:23 am
In P.D. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously reversed a New York State Supreme Court's ruling granting the City of New York's motion to [1] dismiss racial discrimination claims alleged by Plaintiffs pursuant to the New York State and City Human Rights Laws and [2] the hostile work environment claim Plaintiffs alleged pursuant to the New York City Human Rights Law which the Plaintiffs had asserted against the City of New York and a named defendant.Citing Harrington… [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously reversed a New York State Supreme Court's ruling granting the City of New York's motion to [1] dismiss racial discrimination claims alleged by Plaintiffs pursuant to the New York State and City Human Rights Laws and [2] the hostile work environment claim Plaintiffs alleged pursuant to the New York City Human Rights Law which the Plaintiffs had asserted against the City of New York and a named defendant.Citing Harrington… [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Fleury v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
This autocracy threat tracker is also available as a PDF file. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Ford v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:35 am
As contended by second third-party plaintiff, this court holds that the invoice dated April 24, 2017, proffered by second third party defendant, does not irrefutably establish the date on which second thirdparty defendant fulfilled its contractual obligations (see Reiver v Burkhart Wexler & Hirschberg, LLP, 73 AD3d 1149, 1150- 1151 [2nd Dept 2010] [invoices sent by defendant law firm to plaintiff did not constitute irrefutable documentary… [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:36 pm
Supreme Court’s 1938 decision in Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 7:51 am
In Licea v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 2:48 am
[Mhlari NO v Nedbank Limited [2024] ZASCA 39 (4 April 2024)] [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 2:48 am
[Mhlari NO v Nedbank Limited [2024] ZASCA 39 (4 April 2024)] [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 2:30 am
Following Estrada v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm
See Oran v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
Similarly, in Allison v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 12:47 pm
Schaller Duane Morris Takeaways: In Mobley v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:14 am
Facts: This case (Nelson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The first, the Sixth Circuit’s “authority or duty” test, required plaintiffs to prove “state action” by establishing that either (1) the “text of state law requires an officeholder to maintain a social-media account,” (2) the defendant official “use[s] … state resources” or “government staff” to run the account, or (3) the “accoun[t] belong[s] to an office, rather than an individual officeholder. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Employment Relationship Complicated by the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic The recent case of Hurlbut v Low & Low Limited involved the plaintiff (“MH”), a funeral director who was hired by the defendant employer (the “employer”) as a full-time funeral director in December of 2018. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Employment Relationship Complicated by the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic The recent case of Hurlbut v Low & Low Limited involved the plaintiff (“MH”), a funeral director who was hired by the defendant employer (the “employer”) as a full-time funeral director in December of 2018. [read post]
