Search for: "Poland v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 714
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
: General Motors LLC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:17 am
Clearly in this instance, it had no appetite for a Roe v Wade moment. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:00 am
c v Poland when it ruled that there had been a breach of the applicant’s right to a private life under Article 8 of the ECHR because Poland had failed to provide procedural and regulatory framework to determine disputes between the patient and medical specialists regarding access to abortion on therapeutic grounds.[11] The resounding message from both of these decisions is quite simply that if abortion is permissible within a State on certain grounds, then… [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
Nike went after one end user for ordering Chinese counterfeit trainers via the Internet: EWPCC summary judgement in Nike v E Bateman (IP Dragon) Crosstown Music bitten by partial assignment of copyright: EWCA decision in Crosstown v Rive Droite & Ors (IP Whiteboard) Possibility of obtaining summary judgment in patent cases: Patents Court decision in Virgin Atlantic v Delta (Kluwer Patent Blog) Keeping down the price of copyright justice (1709 Blog) United… [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
Poland judgment, § 123). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
The Court’s docket has been unable absorb the accumulation of complaints about these wide-scale violations and to address this problem something akin to the group action was developed, starting with the cases of Broniowski v Poland and Burdov (No. 2) v Russia (failure to compensate following binding domestic judgments). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
The FreeCycle Network (IPBiz) (IP Spotlight) District Court E D North Carolina grants defendant summary judgment on federal and state law trade mark infringement claims in The Daniel Group v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:57 am
Paris and then to Poland. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
‘Complan’ ad-campaign – ‘ad-gurus’ gone wild (Spicy IP) Israel Ruling real legal expenses rather than rough estimate (IP Factor) Israel Ministry of Justice to refund patent filing publication fees to applicants (IP Factor) Kabbalah Diet trademark cancelled due to lack of use (IP Factor) Italy Italian Food Police cracks down on foreign GI counterfeits (Class 46) Poland XAVIER LAURENT – the story continues (Class 46) Poland: most valuable brands… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Geo Networks Ltd v The Bridgewater Canal Co Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1348 (30 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) K, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 3102 (Admin) (29 November 2010) Michael, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 3026 (Admin) (05 November 2010) Kownacki, R (on the application of) v District… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:42 am
That's why I'm talking about Poland and enemies today. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:13 am
Tell that to the European Court of Justice in Case C-487/07 L'Oreal v Bellure, as criticised by the referring court here. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Bakalar v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Roof Security (EPLAW) Miffy miffed by Cathy – Kitty the kopy kat’s friend (IP Factor) Norway Topshop trouble in Norway (Class 46) Poland GUCCI v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm
– Kellogg North America Company v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Otten (EPLAW) Non-infringement case: Safeway v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Loosely related state law claims sufficient for supplemental jurisdiction: Von Holdt v. [read post]
