Search for: "Powell v. Powell" Results 521 - 540 of 2,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by David Whitehead
Mr Knowles began by explaining that the form of joint enterprise in question, Parasitic Accessorial Liability or “PAL”, was a distinct form of liability established by two cases, Chan Wing Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168 and R v Powell and English [1999] 1 AC 1. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 4:12 pm
Volokh says no, some guy at some other school quoted in the NYT says no, Balkin, Tushnet and Amar say yes, and so now I don't know what's the right interpretation of Powell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am by NL
L. v the United Kingdom here. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am by NL
L. v the United Kingdom here. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 8:22 pm
A fundamental principle of criminal law requires any law enforcement officer following an arrest to advise the arrested person of certain Constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 8:22 pm
A fundamental principle of criminal law requires any law enforcement officer following an arrest to advise the arrested person of certain Constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:48 am
” Judge Black also quoted from an earlier Supreme Court opinion, in Powell v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am by chief
R (CN) v LB Lewisham; R (ZH) v Newham LBC [2013] EWCA Civ 804This is a very important decision from the summer. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am by chief
R (CN) v LB Lewisham; R (ZH) v Newham LBC [2013] EWCA Civ 804This is a very important decision from the summer. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:47 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  While the idea of the vanishing jury is not new, this is a good read if you want to learn more about Justice Lewis Powell and his role in cases like Batson v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 1:37 am
Note that, with respect to the last question in particular, the fact that this is an appointment to fill a vacancy weakens -- although it does not eliminate -- the concern in Powell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 7:33 am by Ronald Mann
Of course, it can be hard to craft a sustained narrative about those cases when many deal with relatively obscure statutes that the court rarely examines – such as the Quiet Title Act, the subject of this year’s less than momentous decision in Wilkins v. [read post]