Search for: "President Judge Determination Cases"
Results 521 - 540
of 9,288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2023, 12:01 pm
Alternatively, a judge may look to how Section Three has been interpreted in subsequent cases and rely on meaning developed over time through common law reasoning to determine how that language should be applied in a present case. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
The ICC offers no right to a jury and does not require unanimous verdicts, convicting with only two out of three judges. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 11:34 pm
The Court may sit either as a Grand Chamber of 15 judges (including the President and Vice-President) or in chambers of three or five judges, though Grand Chamber sittings are rare. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:53 am
Kaplan, US District Judge for the Southern District of New York, ruled Wednesday that former President Donald Trump was liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
Those are rare (usually the agreements are structured so that your sentence would be determined by the District Court judge) but, given the stakes here, your importance to the government’s case, and that you are not, as of now, federally indicted, we would surely try. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 3:56 pm
Jean Carroll’s defamation lawsuit will only need to decide how much money Donald Trump will have to pay her, after the judge found the former president was liable(full text of decision)for making defamatory statements. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 4:27 am
Judge Tim Kelly had the difficult task of deciding what sentence to impose on Tarrio. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Jarkesy,[2] a case which raises an important challenge to the power of administrative law judges (ALJs). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:27 am
First, the presiding district court judge, the prosecutor and the defendant must consent to entry of the plea. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
The current filing patterns can also inform the insurers’ efforts to try to determine the profit-making price for their insurance product. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
How judges and juries view facts will often determine coverage regarding causation. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Determinations at CFCE Meetings from December 2022 have now become available and links will be provided in the end-of-month case round-up. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
Moreover, there is evidence that the interaction continues: for example, the then President of the Court, Róbert Spanó, and Judge Tim Eicke told the UK Joint Committee of Human Rights in 2021 (in answer to the Committee’s question 3) that “The sophisticated analysis by the UK domestic courts of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights is indeed relied upon in its judgments against other countries. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm
First, the government noted that the Commission can preside instead of an ALJ, or the Commission can assign one or more of its members to preside over an in-house case. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 12:16 pm
” He says, among other things, that: [T]he draft Guidelines focus less on economics and read more as a legal brief, written in an apparent attempt to convince readers, perhaps judges, that many old cases, often decided prior to 1970, justify the dramatically more aggressive antitrust posture of the current enforcement Agencies (the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission). [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 7:46 am
Trump said, “[Y]ou don’t have a case and you should drop this case. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am
Judge Levy’s decision in Griffin v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 2:18 am
A jury trial will now determine how much money Giuliani must pay in the civil defamation case. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:55 pm
” The judge issued the decision in a default judgment, rather than having the issue go to a jury because Giuliani’s legal team repeatedly failed to turn over evidence requested by the plaintiffs in the case—Freeman and Moss. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:16 am
When there is, judges generally direct the parties to a key case and how they would apply it.And so the question for the judge is how to decide—what standard to use—in the absence of clarity from precedent squarely on point.The thought of using “the totality of the circumstances” test to make the determination keeps bouncing in this former federal prosecutor’s head. [read post]
