Search for: "Price v. State of Illinois"
Results 521 - 540
of 837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2013, 6:11 am
– Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:36 pm
I may write another blog post in the future on how this works, but basically, federal antitrust law mostly prohibits indirect purchasers from suing for damages (see Illinois Brick), so there is often a separate class of indirect purchasers that seek relief under state antitrust law (and sometimes for injunctive relief under federal law). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 4:52 pm
Alliance Financial Services Of Illinois, Ltd., 08 C 3370, 2010 WL 3842366 (N.D. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 2:30 am
A majority of states including Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Illinois and New Jersey have judicially recognized the right to privacy in case law. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
Illinois, 431 US 720 (1977). [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:43 am
The Court of Appeals for one district in Ohio recently approved such a sale in Park National Bank v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:17 pm
Citing West v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The Delaware Supreme Court[1] and federal courts in Florida,[2] New York,[3] Illinois[4] and Georgia[5] have made the BJR available to officers. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Pharmaceutical Pricing Jaime King, University of California Hastings College of the Law, The Burden of Federalism: Challenges to State Attempts at Controlling Prescription Drug Costs Marc Rodwin, Suffolk University Law School, Controlling Pharmaceutical Prices: What the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm
Illinois, antitrust damages claims may be brought by indirect purchasers who do not allege that they paid a price fixed by the alleged conspirators. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Unlike Near, in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Title: Rast v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:13 am
The case is Fres-co Systems USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 4:33 pm
UBS Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:51 am
What happened on the day of FB's IPO to most of the traders of FB shares is a condition little understood-the state of high illiquidity along with a lack of transparency. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 7:23 am
In the amicus brief, we urged the Third District to join the other districts in the state and issue an opinion formally adopting the framework for awarding attorney fees set out by the Supreme Court in Hensley v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 6:48 pm
Alaska Statutes § 09.17.010; State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:33 am
In addition, the price must be stated in a numeric and dollar sign - i.e., $9.99 (Zone 1). [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 7:01 am
Illinois v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 12:08 pm
" Illinois precedents are not entirely clear on this (compare Zdeb v. [read post]
