Search for: "Queen v. Queen" Results 521 - 540 of 4,482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Areas include parts of Brooklyn and Queens and parts of Broome, Orange and Rockland Counties. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
He was buried with military honors in the French War Veterans’ section of Flushing Cemetery in the New York City borough of Queens. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
Never Too Late 282 [Week ending September 13]: UK patent exams: FD4/P6 survey and model answers | UK trade mark registration denied for sign including ‘THE ROYAL BUTLER’, following opposition by Lord Chamberlain (on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen) | Patent exploitation, competition law and the challenge of overlapping subject-matter jurisdiction Photo by Buenosia Carol from Pexels [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Wang
Supreme Court struck down the FACT Act in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The case at issue was an opposition to an application of a mark combining the sign “V” with words “Valentino Rudi” by the Italian high end fashion company Valentino. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
The decision of Bacardi & Company Limited v Dickinson Distribution Group Pty Ltd [2020] ATMO 117 (1 July 2020) confirms the acceptance of the similarity between goods in classes 32 and 33, and in particular accepts that gin is similar to beer. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
The decision of Bacardi & Company Limited v Dickinson Distribution Group Pty Ltd [2020] ATMO 117 (1 July 2020) confirms the acceptance of the similarity between goods in classes 32 and 33, and in particular accepts that gin is similar to beer. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 10:32 am by Magdaleen Jooste
A recent interesting instance can be found in the decision delivered by Justice Bakhru of the Delhi High Court in the case of Monsanto v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
That is what happened in Raichura v Jones, 2020 ABQB 139, a recent decision from the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench.[1] In this case, the lawyer was ordered to pay damages of $131,939. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:28 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-law, Editor, First Reference In Underhill v Shell Canada Limited, 2020 ABQB 341, the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta decided that a senior employee had been wrongfully dismissed after she became tangled up in a subordinate’s attempt to bid on a project independently of the employer. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 7:01 am by Roya Ghafele (OxFirst)
Earlier versions of the doctrine can already be found in 1610 in the case of Vernor v Elvies. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:15 am by Kevin
In layman’s terms, pseudolaw is pure nonsense.AVI v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Queen in right of Alberta, 1971 CanLII 175 (SCC), [1972] S.C.R. 419; Bain v. [read post]