Search for: "Quick v. Department of Justice"
Results 521 - 540
of 684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
A quick note on a useful case on costs where an appeal has been settled. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Department of Homeland Security, Diallo v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:39 pm
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is,” Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:46 am
Howard Highland has posted his article, “A Regulatory Quick-Fix for Carcieri V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:12 pm
The US Justice Department made the same argument before the U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:25 pm
Discussions include the Department of Justice International Guidelines and the 2004 changes in the EU antitrust regime. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
A regulatory quick fix for Carcieri v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:15 am
Indeed, this is the one crime in the area of federal campaign financing that the Department of Justice prosecutes most aggressively. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
In Cobb v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
Justice Sotomayor pressed Anders and Aaron Panner (appearing on behalf of the disappointed patent applicant) on a standard she derived from the Court’s 1894 decision in Morgan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
First, it could seek preclearance from the Department of Justice, which proceeds in a more expedited fashion in that the Department has 60 days to object to the change. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:27 am
SEC v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 5:13 am
As always, the Lexicon provides a quick and dirty summary with an eye to law students (especially first-year law students) with an interest in legal theory. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:26 am
© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:07 am
The response is that Crawford actually reinstates the proper understanding of the Clause, from which the Court departed in Ohio v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 12:53 am
Boumediene v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:57 am
Marbury v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:15 am
The Supreme Court should reject this bad analysis, which the Justice Department unwisely supports. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:22 am
A quick primer on the issue, for those visiting for the first time. [read post]
