Search for: "R. R. D. v. Holder"
Results 521 - 540
of 905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2010, 2:36 am
Of recent cases, National Association of Realtors v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:37 pm
Document shredding and claims of being authorised to take mortgage holders money (Eh?) [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm
Holder, 609 F.3d 1076 (10th Cir. 2010), granted cert. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:26 am
Cal. 2007), aff’d 596 F.3d 696 (9th Cir. 2010) and Bosh v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 2:18 am
§1125 (d) for injunctive and legal remedies for trademark infringement. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:43 pm
CRIA's far more restrictive framework, which it claims is based on the objects of the Copyright Act and the Berne Convention's three-step test: (a) exceptions form a balance to protect against excessive control of copyright holders that would limit the ability to incorporate and embellish creative innovation on the public domain; (b) exceptions should be clearly defined and narrow in scope and reach; (c) exceptions should not permit uses which enter into economic competition… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(! [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 2:06 pm
Roark v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:52 am
If any reader can point us to a site where we might find the OMB action in question, we’d be much obliged.) [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:18 am
Alan D. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
CAS Medical Systems, Inc (Docket Report) District Court M D Pennsylvania: Conflicting claim constructions preclude finding of wilfulness: Arlington Industries v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
CAS Medical Systems, Inc (Docket Report) District Court M D Pennsylvania: Conflicting claim constructions preclude finding of wilfulness: Arlington Industries v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
Only one unreversed Supreme Court majority opinion has upheld a content-based speech restriction on strict scrutiny grounds — last year’s Holder v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:04 pm
Co., 243 F.R.D. 400 (D. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:04 pm
Co., 243 F.R.D. 400 (D. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:19 am
Quattrocchi (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB finds SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION merely descriptive of marketing services (TTABlog) Trademark holder not entitled to domain name registered years before: National Arbitration Forum decision in Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
R. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
Uniquely the Trilogy (or at least one of the cases) held that claims against a generic “reference listed drug” holder could escape preemption. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:27 am
Prior to the ReDigi decision, in 2010 the 9th Circuit issued its judgment in Vernor v Autodesk (a case concerning promo CDs), in which it ruled that, pursuant to 17 USC §109(d) the first sale doctrine does not apply to a person who possesses a copy of a copyright-protected work without owning it. [read post]
