Search for: "R. v. R." Results 521 - 540 of 145,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2022, 8:36 am by Emily Kroboth
L’an dernier, en réponse à l’appel à l’action n° 80 du Rapport de la Commission de vérité et réconciliation, le […] [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 8:36 am by Emily Kroboth
L’an dernier, en réponse à l’appel à l’action n° 80 du Rapport de la Commission de vérité et réconciliation, le […] [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:41 am by Michael Risch
I would expect that companies can usually design in the U.S., send designs overseas (see Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:58 am by traceydennis
KG Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft für Mineraloele mbH & Co v Petroplus Marketing AG (The Mercini Lady)[2010] EWCA Civ 1145; [2010] WLR (D) 259 “There was no justification for implying a term in a contract for the sale of goods that goods which were accepted as complying with specification on loading at a seaport should be capable of remaining in an acceptable condition until unloaded at the end of a voyage. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 2:30 am
Youell and Others v La Réunion Aeriènne Court of Appeal “The mere fact that a claim was the subject of an arbitration agreement did not deprive a court, which could otherwise determine the substance of the claim, of its jurisdiction under Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and [...] [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:07 am by sally
R (One Search Direct Holdings Ltd (trading as One Search Direct)) v York City Council [2010] EWHC 590 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 87 “In failing to provide access to unrefined information, the council was not acting in a way that was contrary to the Government’s intention not to impose an obligation on authorities to allow such access, nor to the aims and purposes of the statutory provisions, including the subsidiary legislation made by the Secretary of State. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 1:56 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Curtis, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1003 (30 April 2009) Straughan, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 955 (28 April 2009) Fazli, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 939 (24 April 2009) Welsh, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 945 (24 April 2009) Hakimzadeh, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 959 (28 April 2009) Source: www.bailii.org [...] [read post]