Search for: "R. v. R." Results 521 - 540 of 144,786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Schwartz, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Tags: Disclosure, Macquarie v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Schwartz, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 Tags: Disclosure, Macquarie v. [read post]
  As has been made clear by the Court of Appeal in cases such as R v Foreign Secretary (No. 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 158, the purpose of providing an embargoed draft to the parties is not to enable them to re-argue the merits of the case. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:21 am by JR Chaves
Es cierto que esos valores, que me atrevería a calificar de universales en cualquier sociedad avanzada, pueden manifestarse a través de infinidad de modelos o vías alternativas, con mayor o menor intensidad, con mayor o mejor acierto técnico o con singular inclinación o exclusión de cuestiones que la respectiva sociedad tenga enraizadas. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
The Chief Justice does not look kindly at what Counselor to the Special Counsel, Michael R. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:50 pm by Andréane Giguère
La Cour rappelle que le droit à une négociation collective véritable ne garantit pas l’accès à un modèle particulier de relations de travail. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Another multi-district litigation (MDL) has hit a jarring speed bump. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Evelyn Tsisin
“My God, what freedoms will you take away next,” President Joseph R. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:00 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Maria Dugas (Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University) has posted Addressing anti-Black Racism in Sentencing: A Critical Comparison of R v Anderson, and R v Morris (The Canadian Bar Review | December 2024 (v 102(3))) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:37 am by Juli Porto
In today’s sole civil published opinion, the Court of Appeals clarifies the adverse witness rule. [read post]