Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE" Results 521 - 540 of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2007, 7:23 pm
Before Royal Ahold and Parmalat (both of 2003) and the likes, there was Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products NV (NASDAQ: LHSP, as it then was) of Belgium, which at one point was worth $10 billion. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:34 am by Jon Hyman
In D-V, LRA is currently ranked 8th in the state. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Thus far, the press has successfully argued that anything more than self-regulation would reduce them to Pravda-esque publications, doing the bidding of the Nanny state Government that would otherwise regulate them. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Further proof that the death of Crawford has been greatly exaggerated comes in the form of a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
United States and Hill v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 am by Meir Feder
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:11 am by tracey
Supreme Court Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd [2011] UKSC 32 (9 November 2011) Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 (9 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P [2011] EWCA Civ 1257 (09 November 2011) Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GMBH & Ors v Carefusion 303 Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 1288 (08 November 2011) SH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1284 (08… [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:50 pm
He is correct: Canada’s head of state is Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
The test of dishonesty is as set out by Lord Nicholls in Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan and by Lord Hoffmann in Barlow Clowes… When dishonesty is in question the fact-finding tribunal must first ascertain (subjectively) the actual state of the individual’s knowledge or belief as to the facts. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 1:55 am by Jocelyn Hutton
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Royal Succession and the Canadian Crown as a Corporation Sole: A Critique of Canada’s Succession to the Throne Act, 2013 Philippe Lagassé and James W.J. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am by Adam Chandler
Royal Dutch Petroleum, which “raises what may be the hottest international law issue now affecting business firms. [read post]