Search for: "Ray v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm
Hoeper — airline immunity for reporting potential threats to air safety No. 12-992 — Ray Haluch Gravel v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
Even readers of the red-top press and children's comics will probably be well apprised of this case by now, although they might be forgiven for getting this case confused with the seeming millions of other Apple v Samsung, Apple v The World, The World v Apple-type disputes that have been plaguing courts across the globe. [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:48 pm
The Valentines, jointly and severally, make a number of arguments based on United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
” Or, as Justice Robert Jackson wrote many years later in Ray v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:07 am
Souter (Ret.) of the Supreme Court of the United States sat by designation.Decision below.TMTV Corp v Mass Productions (1st Cir. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:56 am
In that case (David v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:06 am
He describes the case as “rais[ing] an important test of . . . [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:27 pm
In People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:50 am
In this case, respondent Myriad Genetics holds a patent on two genes, mutations in which are correlated with a higher risk of breast or ovarian cancer, in their “isolated” state. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 pm
Oregon and Johnson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:38 am
At issue in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:38 am
At issue in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm
Proskauer Rose or Ray v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
In the wake of the Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 5:36 am
See Ray v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:46 pm
In Intel v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 5:52 am
“Vacating the dismissal order is consistent with the public policy of this State to dispose of cases on their merits (Harwood v Chaliha, 291 AD2d 234, 234 [1st Dept 2002]), and upholds the principle that a trial court’s power to dismiss an action sua sponte should be used ‘sparingly and only in extraordinary circumstances'” (Cooper v Broems, 214 AD3d 497, 497 [1st Dept 2023] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ray v… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:01 am
We posted earlier this month about Joseph v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 11:23 am
On October 8, 2009, the Court of Appeals approved for publication its decision in Lockridge v. [read post]
