Search for: "Ridings v. Ridings" Results 521 - 540 of 4,783
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2021, 12:39 am by INFORRM
  They should be under no illusion that their failure (or inability) to obtain legal representation allows them to ride roughshod over the rules. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 8:00 am
v=dqsJbfWGXGEVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991 backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 5:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
[I could use a few more judges — you can sign-up via doodle; or contact my Teaching Assistant Homayoon Rafatijo] This year’s case is based directly on Judge Gilstrap’s recent patent eligibility decision in  Mad Dogg Athletics v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 12:33 pm
The grant-funded California Restraint Safety Education and Training (CARSEAT) V campaign is aimed at improving child passenger safety throughout the state. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Without that explicit exclusion, however, the fringe benefit would be taxable because it is income.The billionaires who are worried about this new tax proposal are not like the rest of us, and one of the ways that they are different is that the tax code allows them to become richer and richer without having to pay tax, even as their net worth goes up and up.Senator Wyden’s proposal says that, for only the wealthiest Americans, this free ride is over. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Without that explicit exclusion, however, the fringe benefit would be taxable because it is income.The billionaires who are worried about this new tax proposal are not like the rest of us, and one of the ways that they are different is that the tax code allows them to become richer and richer without having to pay tax, even as their net worth goes up and up.Senator Wyden’s proposal says that, for only the wealthiest Americans, this free ride is over. [read post]
The recent Oatly case [Oatly AB v Glebe Farm Foods Limited [2021] EWHC 2189 (IPEC)] raises some interesting questions in the context of a likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage. [read post]
The recent Oatly case [Oatly AB v Glebe Farm Foods Limited [2021] EWHC 2189 (IPEC)] raises some interesting questions in the context of a likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage. [read post]