Search for: "Roberts v. Does, et al" Results 521 - 540 of 869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
Indeed, a typical “journal” will most likely look very different years from now than it does today. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 2:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
  But that case, Thomas More Law Center, et al., v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of iRunway India Private, Ltd.Amicus brief of Law ProfessorsAmicus brief of the TPL Group et al. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm by R Grace Rodriguez
 READ BELOW FOR THE WHOLE DECISION 2011 WL 2612835Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115, restricts citation of unpublished opinions in California courts.Court of Appeal, Fifth District, California.Mark DEMUCHA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE INC., Defendant and Respondent.No. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:13 am by Walter Olson
” [Palm Beach Post via Radley Balko] On “unauthorized practice of law” as protective moat around profession’s interests, Britain does things differently [Gillian Hadfield via Andrew Sullivan; related, Larry Ribstein] Forthcoming book by Robert Crandall et al urges lawyer deregulation [Brookings] “The Treaty Clause Doesn’t Give Congress Unlimited Power” [Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Golan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The appellant’s argument was that the closed material procedure does not suffer from the defects disclosed by the Carnduff dilemma. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
The controlling opinion of the three in Thomas More Law Center, et al., v. [read post]