Search for: "Rules of Evidence v. Rules"
Results 521 - 540
of 59,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2010, 8:25 am
In Personal Audio v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:27 pm
Facts of NE Physical Therapy Plus v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 4:53 am
In Sabam v Netlog (C? [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:51 am
Al-Khawaja and Tahery v United Kingdom (15 December 2011) – read judgment The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has ruled today that convictions based on statements from witnesses who could not be cross examined in court did not violate the applicants’ rights under Article 6(3) (d) to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses fair trial. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
A (A Child) v The Chief Constable of Dorset Police [2010] EWHC 1748 (Admin) (16 July 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that the gist of sensitive evidence in a case involving a child being picked up for being spotted with an “inappropriate adult” must be disclosed in order that the child can bring a claim against the police. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:28 pm
In today’s case (Petojevic v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 4:47 pm
By: Loyd Willaford and Mathias Deeg In Cook v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
Like its federal counterpart, Kentucky Rule of Evidence 403 provides that Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of undue prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by... [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:34 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 413(a) provides that In a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of an offense of sexual assault, evidence of the defendant's commission of another offense or offenses of sexual assault is admissible, and may... [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 7:24 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 407 provides that: When, after an injury or harm allegedly caused by an event, measures are taken that, if taken previously, would have made the injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent... [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Currently Rule 16 does not require the government to turn over all exculpatory evidence but the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:57 am
In Bush v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:30 am
However, such evidence cannot be used to vary unambiguous terms of a contract. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
Case citation: Goldline, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
(holding Rule 11 agreement enforced by breach-of contract claim); see also Padilla v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
Morrison v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:40 am
Plaintiff asserted that the defendant was misapplying the entire market value rule and ignoring the evidence. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:43 pm
Cire v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:43 am
Like its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 607 provides that The credibility of a witness may be attacked by any party, including the party calling the witness. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:57 pm
NPRM to Codify Existing Practices with Notable Exception The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking today to update its rules to conform to SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
