Search for: "Russell v. May"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
” At SCOTUSblog, Kevin Russell recaps yesterday’s five-four decision in Rent-a-Center v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 5:14 am
” People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 2:22 pm
Microsoft, NTP v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:40 am
Another classic example is Designer Guild v Russell Williams, here, where the House of Lords had to repair the damage done by the Court of Appeal]. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 3:19 pm
” People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:50 am
” Cohn v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
Such was the case in Kerson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 4:53 am
SCOTUS may still be three weeks away from oral argument, but that doesn’t mean the court’s closed for business. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:40 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Briefly: At Constitution Daily, Lyle discusses how recent events in Rhode Island and Delaware, which became the tenth and eleventh states to allow same-sex marriage, may influence the Justices as they decide Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:14 am
Craig Russell is an attorney at Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
Califano v. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 9:51 am
” Razor v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:02 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Heffernan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:54 am
Under CPLR 302 (a) (1), ” ‘a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over any non-domiciliary . . . who in person or through an agent . . . transacts any business within the state’ ” (People v Frisco Mktg. of NY LLC, 93 AD3d 1352, 1353 [4th Dept 2012]). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
Christopher may revisit the problematic case of Auer v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:59 am
Other coverage of yesterday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
