Search for: "S.C., Matter of" Results 521 - 540 of 960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 8:34 am by Jeff Welty
As a preliminary matter, a vehicle search incident to arrest that is based on the arrestee’s proximity to the vehicle is pretty clearly limited to the passenger compartment. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 5:17 am by Ron Miller
She applied for unemployment benefits, but the company argued that she was ineligible under S.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
Egonu, 2007 CanLII 30475 (ON S.C.)]before Justice Murray and the discussions that took place from which I excerpted in this note. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:44 am by Will Newman
Esteban Maqueo Barnetche is a partner at the Mexico City law firm, Maqueo Barnetche, Aguilar y Camarena, S.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:41 pm by Gregory Forman
Finally the Court of Appeals explained why it was remanding the matter back for a complete new trial (something I do not recall the Court of Appeals ever doing in a family court appeal): When an order from the family court fails to make specific findings of fact in support of the court’s decision, the appellate court may remand the matter to the family court but when the record is sufficient, the court may make its own findings of fact in accordance with the preponderance of… [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This matter underwent two significant adjournments prior to its ultimate scheduled 2017 trial. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:21 am by MacIsaac
  The burden of proof of these matters lay with Mrs. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:02 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told reporters that he believes the leak investigation only spans the cyberattack and the underwear bomb plot. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:42 am by conn
”Indeed, history shows that as the government becomes more involved in matters of religion, the institutions of religion lose their free agency. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm by Joy Waltemath
She applied for unemployment benefits, but the company argued that she was ineligible under S.C. [read post]
9 May 2010, 2:59 pm by Tamara Piety
Federal Election Comm'n, 130 S.C. 876, 899 (2010) ('First Amendment protection extends to corporations.'). [read post]