Search for: "SELLERS v. SELLERS"
Results 521 - 540
of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2010, 12:05 pm
In Keynes v Rural Directions Pty Ltd [2010] FCAFC 100 the Full Court of the Federal Court discnissed an appeal from the Federal Court decision that the forward contracts were not financial products by virtue of the operation of s761D(3)(a). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 12:06 am
Practice point: New York adheres to the doctrine, and imposes no liability on a seller for failing to disclose information regarding the premises when the parties deal at arms length, unless there is active concealment.Student note: For concealment to be actionable as fraud, the plaintiffs must show that the defendants thwarted the plaintiffs' efforts to fulfill their responsibilities imposed by the doctrine.Case: Camisa v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:34 pm
In California, whether the retailer seeks a sales tax reimbursement from the customer is a matter of contract between the buyer and seller. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:32 pm
It claimed its website was an “online marketplace” and E-Life (Lenoge) was the product seller, not Amazon. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:31 pm
Robert Nattress & Associates v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:03 pm
The company can’t turn a profit to save its life, but CEO Patrick Byrne blames that on short sellers. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
In Gorton v Marmon 2012 NY Slip Op 31073(U) April 16, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 108094/11 Judge: Joan M. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
In the recent case of Content Services Ltd v Bundesarbeitskammer (C? [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 4:24 am
Inc., et al. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 8:13 am
Nicopure Labs, LLC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2006, 6:07 am
This week's update discusses the New Jersey Appellate Division's ruling in Micheve v. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 6:02 am
It is styled, Lauger Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 5:20 am
Fici v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 8:30 am
See: Sales v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 8:02 pm
In Cyber Holding LLC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:16 am
Practice point: New York adheres to the doctrine and imposes no liability on a seller for failing to disclose information regarding the premises when the parties deal at arm's length, unless there is some conduct which constitutes active concealment.Student note: A plaintiff seeking to recover damages for active concealment must show that the defendant thwarted the plaintiff's efforts to fulfill the responsibilities imposed by the doctrine.Case: Margolin v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:25 am
Molly Stearns, et al., v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:46 am
State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 5:36 am
The Court of Appeal held in Strategix, Inc. v. [read post]
