Search for: "SIMON v. STATE" Results 521 - 540 of 1,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2018, 2:54 am by Walter Olson
California state agency in charge of Prop 65 enforcement seeks to effectively reverse judge’s recent ruling and exempt naturally occurring acrylamide levels in coffee from need for warning [Cal Biz Lit] Prop 65 listing mechanism requires listing of substances designated by a strictly private organization, spot the problem with that [WLF brief in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:21 am by Yaaser Vanderman
The Supreme Court recently delivered judgment in the case of Patmalniece (FC) v SoS for Work and Pensions. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in this Term’s drunk-driving cases, Bernard v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:44 am by Broc Romanek
The case is Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am by Isabel McArdle
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:03 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Army General (Retired), Thayer Leader Development Group, West Point Douglas Ollivant, ASU Future of War Senior Fellow, New America Gideon Rose, Editor, Foreign Affairs Emma Sky, Senior Fellow, Jackson Institute for Global Affairs, Yale University  Steven Simon, Visiting Lecturer, Dartmouth College    V. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The phone hacking saga continues with Byline Investigates reporting that Sienna Miller and Sir Simon Hughes have launched claims against the Sun. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:18 am by Joy Waltemath
A professor at a university in Oregon who alleged she was placed on a terminal contract on the basis of her age and disability was only required to prove that her disability was a motivating factor in the employment decision, held a federal district court in Oregon (Siring v Oregon State Board of Higher Education, October 15, 2013, Simon, M). [read post]