Search for: "SMITH v. DAVIS"
Results 521 - 540
of 693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
June 30, 2004); Davis v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Smith(2017), suggesting that he may not be eager to revisit marriage equality. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
On 12 June 2023 Nicklin J dealt with directions in the committal application in Davies v Carter. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the… [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Tendering of a cheque can amount to (conditional) payment, if the cheque is honoured (Felix Hadley & Co v Hadley (1898) 2 Ch 681 ), and if so, counts as payment at the date the cheque is tendered (Homes v Smith (2000) Lloyds LR 139 ). [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 10:05 pm
C.A.), Elloway v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Smith , No. 08-1477 Sentence for distribution of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant defendant a continuance for another chance to present expert testimony; 2) the district court correctly applied 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553 (a) when sentencing defendant, and did not fail to adequately address the factors set forth in the statute; and 3) there is no evidence that the district court's tangential statements about early… [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Davis, No. 07-1964 A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) although a vehicular safety statute involving dangling ornaments that police relied upon to make the stop at issue was unconstitutionally vague; 2) nevertheless, the exclusionary rule did not apply as police were relying in good faith on a presumptively valid statute. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Parke, Davis & Co., 667 F. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
It was Jeremy Hunt’s former special adviser Adam Smith and News Corporation lobbyist Frédéric Michel, however, who dominated the news coverage. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
Davis Polk represents the issuer, Herbert Smith the underwriters. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 11:51 am
July In July the decision is published in the OFT v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Maine Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Maine Smith v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Davis, No. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
Smith reports for the Tampa Bay Times. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
Rulings IPSO has issued six rulings: 04324-19 Macdonald v Evening Telegraph (Dundee), 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 04186-19 Mmono v Manchester Evening News, 1 Accuracy (2018), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 03509-19 McEleny v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 04225-19 Versi v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2018), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 02706-19 Stroud v… [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
Last up is Shabo v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Parke-Davis, 2000 WL 33910097, at *4 (M.D. [read post]
