Search for: "SMITH v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 521 - 540 of 1,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Just Security continues its series analyzing the court’s 2019-20 term with an article by Gerald Neuman on Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 8:51 am by Brian Cuban
“The Justice Department did not “decide” that federal law trumps California law. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
We conclude that the evidence likely now meets Department of Justice standards to commence a prosecution. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Department of Justice Attorney Sharon Swingle before the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
My court freed Smith, but the Supreme Court summarily reversed (over Justice Ginsburg’s impassioned dissent) based on AEDPA. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the March 22, March 29, April 12, April 18, April 26, May 9, May 16, May 23 and May 30 conferences)   Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
Even after the blow-by-blow, we are left wondering why Roberts departed from his conservative colleagues in the ACA case. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd & Anor v Smith, heard 20-21 Feb 2018. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Several former senior Justice Department officials testified about a bizarre effort by Clark to volunteer himself and the department as advocates for Trump’s bogus claims of massive voter fraud during the election. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
United States The Justice Department’s Civil Division told a federal appellate court that it will continue to try and defend former President Donald Trump in a libel suit brought by E. [read post]