Search for: "SMITH v. STATE"
Results 521 - 540
of 10,900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brackeen AB 599/1 37 6/15/23 21-1576 Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brackeen AB 599/1 37 6/15/23 21-1576 Smith v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 9:04 am
The transition from first-to-invent to first-to-file has involved a number of quirks, the latest is found in SNIPR Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a breach of… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm
Representative Jason Smith (R-Mo.), stated that the rule would remove “the coverage many Americans have and can afford today. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
The case is Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Smith (9th Cir. 2003)). [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
§ 371, which prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States in the administration of elections. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
United States) and June 27, 2023 (Counterman v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:24 am
To illustrate, in Shore v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Ehmer v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
[The Supreme Court's misguided decision to grant Lorie Smith standing to pursue her entirely hypothetical claim against the State of Colorado in the web designer case.] [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]). [read post]
