Search for: "STATE v CASTLE" Results 521 - 540 of 799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Justin P. Webb
Namely, we don't outlaw guns, even though we know they can kill people but are also used lawfully (the majority of the time); therefore, the argument goes, we can't punish makers of guns because of the potential harm they may cause - we leave the criminal consequences at the doorstep of the individual, instead - they are boxed in by the confines of the law as their state has legislated (most often) and absent just cause (e.g., the Castle Doctrine), murder is murder. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by Giles Peaker
TJ v London & Quadrant Housing Trust, County Court at Central London, 18 November 2020, HHJ Saggerson. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 11:43 am by Joanna L. Grossman
Women’s health is under attack—here, there, and everywhere.Domestically, we see Trump’s pick of a Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, who he suspects might vote to overturn Roe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:29 am by Glenn Reynolds
The changes to the law resulted from a widely criticized Indiana State Supreme Court ruling, Barnes v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But in California, the state’s highest court enforced a surrogacy agreement in 1993, in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 2:37 pm by Allison Murphy, Scott R. Anderson
In doing so, it largely paraphrases the analysis presented by Acting General Counsel for the Department of Defense William Castle in a set of December 2017 remarks. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In 1972, the Court went further and found in Eisenstadt v. [read post]