Search for: "STATE v HANSEN"
Results 521 - 540
of 583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Feb. 6, 2009) ("Guinan I"), and Guinan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 10:27 am
The Supreme Court addressed that issue in the recent case of Patel v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:07 pm
By Glen Hansen In Arcadia Development Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
The only news coverage that I've found of yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in Harbison v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:33 am
Everyone can read the full Harbison v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:38 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
By Glen Hansen In Romoland School District v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Hansen The recent decision by the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three in Hines v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
(IP Spotlight) (Excess copyright) (Patent Docs) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (IP Law Observer) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (IP Spotlight) (The Prior Art) (Patent Baristas) (EFF) (Patent Prospector) (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IP Updates) (Daily Dose of IP) (PLI) (Green Patent… [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:33 pm
" [28] The remedy for violation of a non-compete agreement is either damages or an injunction. [29] Additionally, new employers may be held liable for hiring an employee who has signed a non-compete agreement with another employer. [30] V. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
By Glen Hansen In Zanelli v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:50 pm
Baumbast v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Case C-413/99, [2002] ECR I-07091 was raised. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 2:11 pm
On September 26, 2008, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania decided Hansen v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(University of Chicago)Hansen Lars (University of Chicago)Harris Milton (University of Chicago)Hart Oliver (Harvard University)Hazlett Thomas W. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 6:20 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Lester Smith v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 3:55 pm
I’ll try not to be too geeky here, but the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion recently in Boschetto v. [read post]
